Any Candace Owen fans?

[TexasTiger 14,070]

https://www.facebook.com/share/r/tuyvNqNaVnSbnPF1/?mibextid=rS40aB7S9Ucbxw6v

[WillMunny 1,524]

She's pretty.  Very pretty.  Bordering on beautiful.

She makes some good points, and not-so-good points.  Like everyone else.

[SaltyTiger 8,526]

She is pretty. Recall the name but had google her.

[Leftfield 3,307]

So the first thing everyone says about her is she's pretty. Nicely sums up her talent as a political commentator.

 

[SaltyTiger 8,526]

Just now, Leftfield said:

So the first thing everyone says about her is she's pretty. Nicely sums up her talent as a political commentator.

 

Never heard her. If I did wasn’t interested I guess.

[AUDub 11,784]

55 minutes ago, WillMunny said:

She's pretty.  Very pretty.  Bordering on beautiful.

She makes some good points, and not-so-good points.  Like everyone else.

“Not-so-good points” is doing a lot of heavy lifting for rat****ing nuttery. 

[aubaseball 2,788]

If this is the majority of this forum, it’s no wonder where most get their information.   She is very popular and travels around the country for years speaking on issues.   She has spoken before congress and has put several Democratic members to shame.   

[CoffeeTiger 5,843]

4 minutes ago, aubaseball said:

If this is the majority of this forum, it’s no wonder where most get their information.   She is very popular and travels around the country for years speaking on issues.   She has spoken before congress and has put several Democratic members to shame.   

 

The woman is quite literally an idiot who automatically latches onto every conspiracy theory that pops up and does absolutely no research into anything she says or believes. 

Wont deny that her and her ideas are very popular with Conservatives though. 

 

[ArgoEagle 2,039]

11 minutes ago, aubaseball said:

If this is the majority of this forum, it’s no wonder where most get their information.   She is very popular and travels around the country for years speaking on issues.   She has spoken before congress and has put several Democratic members to shame.   

Yeah. I saw a clip of her where she just undressed Jerry Nadler for misquoting her in front of a bunch of other Congressmen.   Bahahaha!   Hilarious!

[AUDub 11,784]

11 hours ago, ArgoEagle said:

Yeah. I saw a clip of her where she just undressed Jerry Nadler for misquoting her in front of a bunch of other Congressmen.   Bahahaha!   Hilarious!

Look up the Ted Lieu/Hitler one lol. 

[AUFAN78 4,130]

 

[DKW 86 7,866]

On 7/18/2024 at 8:55 PM, AUFAN78 said:

 

I am no Candace Owens fan. But Nadler and Lieu are both pathological liars. I am 100% correct on this. Lieu is my favorite flaming moron in the house, no question. He misquotes all the time, every day. It is a testament to the profound partisanship of his district in CA that this clown stays in the HOR. 

Edited July 20 by DKW 86

[AUDub 11,784]

3 hours ago, DKW 86 said:

I am no Candace Owens fan. But Nadler and Lieu are both pathological liars. I am 100% correct on this. Lieu is my favorite flaming moron in the house, no question. He misquotes all the time, every day. It is a testament to the profound partisanship of his district in CA that this clown stays in the HOR. 

He didn’t misquote her here. She literally said she was okay with Hitler lol. 

[AUFAN78 4,130]

2 hours ago, AUDub said:

He didn’t misquote her here. She literally said she was okay with Hitler lol. 

In context, she was speaking about nationalism and that she had no problem with nationalism. She stated Hitler was a homicidal, psychopathic maniac that killed his own people. She added nationalist do not kill their own people.

[AUDub 11,784]

7 hours ago, AUFAN78 said:

In context, she was speaking about nationalism and that she had no problem with nationalism. She stated Hitler was a homicidal, psychopathic maniac that killed his own people. She added nationalist do not kill their own people.

Here’s the quote:

“I actually don't have any problems at all with the word 'nationalism'. I think that the definition gets poisoned by elitists that actually want globalism. Globalism is what I don't want, so when you think about whenever we say nationalism, the first thing people think about, at least in America, is Hitler. He was a national socialist. But if Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well, okay, fine. The problem is that he wanted, he had dreams outside of Germany. He wanted to globalize. He wanted everybody to be German, everybody to be speaking German. Everybody to look a different way. To me, that's not nationalism. In thinking about how we could go bad down the line, I don't really have an issue with nationalism. I really don't. I think that it's okay.”

So he was a globalist because, uh, conquest?

A: this is extremely balls to the wall dumb because Nationalism and conquest are in no way incompatible, and the foundation of Hitler’s ideology was *nationalism.* The only context in which calling Hitler a globalist makes sense is because he got the globe to unite against him lol.

B: “The problem is that he wanted, he has dreams outside of Germany.” This pretty much says she’s fine with the whole fascism part lol. 

[AUFAN78 4,130]

4 hours ago, AUDub said:

Here’s the quote:

“I actually don't have any problems at all with the word 'nationalism'. I think that the definition gets poisoned by elitists that actually want globalism. Globalism is what I don't want, so when you think about whenever we say nationalism, the first thing people think about, at least in America, is Hitler. He was a national socialist. But if Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well, okay, fine. The problem is that he wanted, he had dreams outside of Germany. He wanted to globalize. He wanted everybody to be German, everybody to be speaking German. Everybody to look a different way. To me, that's not nationalism. In thinking about how we could go bad down the line, I don't really have an issue with nationalism. I really don't. I think that it's okay.”

So he was a globalist because, uh, conquest?

A: this is extremely balls to the wall dumb because Nationalism and conquest are in no way incompatible, and the foundation of Hitler’s ideology was *nationalism.* The only context in which calling Hitler a globalist makes sense is because he got the globe to unite against him lol.

B: “The problem is that he wanted, he has dreams outside of Germany.” This pretty much says she’s fine with the whole fascism part lol. 

From the quote and as I stated previously, in context, she is saying she is okay with nationalism, not Hitler.

[homersapien 12,172]

16 hours ago, AUDub said:

Here’s the quote:

“I actually don't have any problems at all with the word 'nationalism'. I think that the definition gets poisoned by elitists that actually want globalism. Globalism is what I don't want, so when you think about whenever we say nationalism, the first thing people think about, at least in America, is Hitler. He was a national socialist. But if Hitler just wanted to make Germany great and have things run well, okay, fine. The problem is that he wanted, he had dreams outside of Germany. He wanted to globalize. He wanted everybody to be German, everybody to be speaking German. Everybody to look a different way. To me, that's not nationalism. In thinking about how we could go bad down the line, I don't really have an issue with nationalism. I really don't. I think that it's okay.”

So he was a globalist because, uh, conquest?

A: this is extremely balls to the wall dumb because Nationalism and conquest are in no way incompatible, and the foundation of Hitler’s ideology was *nationalism.* The only context in which calling Hitler a globalist makes sense is because he got the globe to unite against him lol.

B: “The problem is that he wanted, he has dreams outside of Germany.” This pretty much says she’s fine with the whole fascism part lol. 

Man, she is confused.  Hitler a "globalist" ?! 

She obviously doesn't understand what globalism means. It's collaboration, not conquering.

We've experimented politically  with nationalism before - in the 1930's.  How did that work out?

The parallels with current Republican nationalism and Putin are disturbingly similar to the Republican nationalism and Hitler in the 1930s.

 

Edited July 21 by homersapien

[TexasTiger 14,070]

Gets deeper in the crazy:

 

[AUDub 11,784]

I didn’t think it was possible but she’s getting even more nuts. 

[Gowebb11 9,801]

8 hours ago, TexasTiger said:

Gets deeper in the crazy:

 

This is deeply, deeply disturbing. More so because she actually has a strong following of others who believe her. 

[alanevans 232]

On 7/20/2024 at 10:26 AM, AUDub said:

He didn’t misquote her here. She literally said she was okay with Hitler lol. 

Exactly

[AU9377 5,922]

On 7/18/2024 at 10:29 AM, ArgoEagle said:

Yeah. I saw a clip of her where she just undressed Jerry Nadler for misquoting her in front of a bunch of other Congressmen.   Bahahaha!   Hilarious!

I think we can all agree that nobody wants to see Jerry Nadler undressed.  LOL

[homersapien 12,172]

10 hours ago, AUDub said:

I didn’t think it was possible but she’s getting even more nuts. 

She's evidently trying to appeal to modern Republicans.  They have a strong affinity to "nuts".

[CoffeeTiger 5,843]

This is a good one.

 

A clip of an interview with C Owens and Tristan Tate.

A high school drop out and a college drop out bragging to each other about how they are more intelligent than all the worlds scientists, doctors, and most college graduates.....apparently they believe that having money = smarts. 

 

 

Edited August 15 by CoffeeTiger

[homersapien 12,172]

1 hour ago, CoffeeTiger said:

This is a good one.

 

A clip of an interview with C Owens and Tristan Tate.

A high school drop out and a college drop out bragging to each other about how they are more intelligent than all the worlds scientists, doctors, and most college graduates.....apparently they believe that having money = smarts. 

 

 

"Cult of science" ?