AUDub 12,021 Posted July 5 Share Posted July 5 20 hours ago, AURex said: He was IN FACT found guilty. The jury ruled that he did IN FACT defame E. Jean Carroll. In order to come to that GUILTY verdict, the jury determined that Trump did IN FACT sexually assault E. Jean Carroll. So he was, IN FACT, found guilty of sexual assault and thus LIABLE for $80+ Million in damages for defamation. So you can cry elephant tears that this was not a "criminal" case and just some lowly "civil" case. But the FACT IS, the juries in both cases determined that Trump sexually assaulted the woman and thus was guilty of defamation. They love it when you flub terminology. He was found liable, not guilty. Put down the shovel. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AUDub 12,021 Posted July 5 Share Posted July 5 (edited) These words have meaning and you can’t just make your preferred terminology true by asserting it. Get it right. Edited July 5 by AUDub Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AURex 2,303 Posted July 5 Share Posted July 5 2 hours ago, AUDub said: They love it when you flub terminology. He was found liable, not guilty. Put down the shovel. He was found "liable" for defamation. But in order to find Trump "liable" for defamation, the jury had to first determine whether he did IN FACT sexually assault E. Jean Carroll. Which they DID! The jury ruled that he was guilty of sexually assaulting her, thus he was guilty of defamation. TWICE. More than $80 Million in fines. Trump apologists cannot wriggle out of this. He admitted to sexually assaulting women years ago. He paid off women to keep their mouth shut. He has been tried and convicted. There is no denialism to circumvent the facts. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JMWATS 337 Posted July 5 Share Posted July 5 8 hours ago, AURex said: He was found "liable" for defamation. But in order to find Trump "liable" for defamation, the jury had to first determine whether he did IN FACT sexually assault E. Jean Carroll. Which they DID! The jury ruled that he was guilty of sexually assaulting her, thus he was guilty of defamation. TWICE. More than $80 Million in fines. Trump apologists cannot wriggle out of this. He admitted to sexually assaulting women years ago. He paid off women to keep their mouth shut. He has been tried and convicted. There is no denialism to circumvent the facts. People on here trying to help you and you won't accept it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mims44 2,040 Posted July 5 Share Posted July 5 8 hours ago, AURex said: He was found "liable" for defamation. But in order to find Trump "liable" for defamation, the jury had to first determine whether he did IN FACT sexually assault E. Jean Carroll. Which they DID! The jury ruled that he was guilty of sexually assaulting her, thus he was guilty of defamation. TWICE. More than $80 Million in fines. Trump apologists cannot wriggle out of this. He admitted to sexually assaulting women years ago. He paid off women to keep their mouth shut. He has been tried and convicted. There is no denialism to circumvent the facts. I went in and out a lot during that trial. Wasn't that the one where she only narrowed it down to somewhere between 1992 and 1997, and never went to police or hospital or mentioned it to anyone for 20 years? Was there ever any proof brought? Or did it stay a "he said, she said" and verdict was because he's known to be a pathological liar and she's not? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now