For all the bickering

[jj3jordan 2,160]

4 hours ago, homersapien said:

If you go back and read carefully, you will note that:

That discussion occurred election night (that's Nov. 11)

Gore conceded (permanently) Nov. 24, after the court cases were finished. (Which is another story because SCOTUS halted the Florida vote counting.)

Conclusion:  You are either stupid or trying to promote a deliberate lie.  

(My money is on both.)

What lie is this of which you speak? It happened on Nov 7 not Nov 11.  And the counting never actually stopped. The SCOTUS deadline allowed FL to certify the vote. But counting continued apace for weeks but oddly enough they NEVER came up with a win for Gore. All big Al had to do was carry his home state. So not another story. One of us is stupid I guess. Not the one who can’t read a calendar though.

[Leftfield 3,309]

https://apnews.com/article/2000-mules-film-apology-f1c2de96f17e72241761b4e6deaee5cb

 

Publisher of ‘2000 Mules’ apologizes to Georgia man falsely accused of ballot fraud in the film

BY  KATE BRUMBACK

Updated 7:55 PM CDT, May 31, 2024

ATLANTA (AP) — The publisher of “2000 Mules” issued a statement Friday apologizing to a Georgia man who was shown in the film and falsely accused of ballot fraud during the 2020 election.

The widely debunked film includes surveillance video showing Mark Andrews, his face blurred, putting five ballots in a drop box in Lawrenceville, an Atlanta suburb, as a voiceover by conservative pundit and filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza says: “What you are seeing is a crime. These are fraudulent votes.”

Salem Media Group said in the statement that it has “removed the film from Salem’s platforms, and there will be no future distribution of the film or the book by Salem.”

“It was never our intent that the publication of the 2000 Mules film and book would harm Mr. Andrews. We apologize for the hurt the inclusion of Mr. Andrews’ image in the movie, book, and promotional materials have caused Mr. Andrews and his family,” the statement said.

A state investigation found that Andrews was dropping off ballots for himself, his wife and their three adult children, who all lived at the same address. That is legal in Georgia, and an investigator said there was no evidence of wrongdoing by Andrews.

The film uses research from True the Vote, a Texas-based nonprofit, and suggests that ballot “mules” aligned with Democrats were paid to illegally collect and deliver ballots in Georgia and four other closely watched states. An Associated Press analysis found that it is based on faulty assumptions, anonymous accounts and improper analysis of cellphone location data.

Salem said it “relied on representations by Dinesh D’Souza and True the Vote, Inc. (“TTV”) that the individuals depicted in the videos provided to us by TTV, including Mr. Andrews, illegally deposited ballots.”

Lawyers for D’Souza and True the Vote did not immediately respond to emails Friday afternoon seeking comment on Salem’s statement.

Andrews filed a federal lawsuit in October 2022 against D’Souza, True the Vote and Salem. The case is ongoing, and representatives for Salem and for Andrews’ legal team did not immediately respond to emails asking whether the statement came as a result of the lawsuit.

[AUFAN78 4,130]

On 5/27/2024 at 7:12 PM, auburnatl1 said:

My 2 cents -  don’t struggle. Theyre lucky they weren’t convicted for treason. Last somebody forcibly penetrated the capital was the British in 1812.

https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/4746932-scotus-just-downgraded-the-insurrection-to-trespassing/

[auburnatl1 6,020]

18 minutes ago, AUFAN78 said:

https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/4746932-scotus-just-downgraded-the-insurrection-to-trespassing/

Good news for your buddies

[AUFAN78 4,130]

2 hours ago, auburnatl1 said:

Good news for your buddies

Aw shucks, did you don the pink tutu to respond? Come on man, I told you I was hearing there were questions about some of the charges for those waived in for nothing more than photo ops. Told you I thought they were foolish, but that there were questions about their obstruction charges. Welp, and just like that what I heard was correct. This isn't complicated, please don't stoop to ankle grabbing. 

[auburnatl1 6,020]

1 hour ago, AUFAN78 said:

Aw shucks, did you don the pink tutu to respond? Come on man, I told you I was hearing there were questions about some of the charges for those waived in for nothing more than photo ops. Told you I thought they were foolish, but that there were questions about their obstruction charges. Welp, and just like that what I heard was correct. This isn't complicated, please don't stoop to ankle grabbing. 

I’m guessing that was an attempt at some kind of man up post.

Look, we deeply disagree on the severity of what happened that day and the personalities maga is composed of. I switched from being a republican a month after the “trespassing”.

Edited July 2 by auburnatl1

[Leftfield 3,309]

10 minutes ago, auburnatl1 said:

I’m guessing that was an attempt at some kind of man up post.

He does that.

[AUFAN78 4,130]

8 minutes ago, auburnatl1 said:

I’m guessing that was an attempt at some kind of man up post.

Look, we deeply disagree on the severity of what happened that day and the personalities maga is composed of. I switched from being a republican a month after the “trespassing”.

The post was a response to the "my friends" backhanded comment.

Look, your childish comment is forgivable. Happens far too often on this forum which is sad, but in this hate-filled world of politics understandable albeit avoidable. 

I've stated many times the persons involved in the violence that day deserve every bit of time and sentence appropriate for their actions. I also know there were those with no initial intention to enter who ultimately did so in a non-violent manner. I told you previously I thought this to be a foolish endeavor, but it happened. I also told you I was hearing they may get relief as they were overcharged. I was told right. IIWII

Perhaps a bit of thought before impulsively speaking is my tip for the day? .Carry on. 

[AUFAN78 4,130]

26 minutes ago, Leftfield said:

He does that.

I never intended to b**** slap you. It just happened. 

[auburnatl1 6,020]

4 hours ago, Leftfield said:

He does that.

Quite a bad ass

[Leftfield 3,309]

3 hours ago, auburnatl1 said:

Quite a bad ass

I've always been impressed. He's like Samuel Jackson without all that charisma baggage.

[homersapien 12,172]

10 hours ago, auburnatl1 said:

I’m guessing that was an attempt at some kind of man up post.

Look, we deeply disagree on the severity of what happened that day and the personalities maga is composed of. I switched from being a republican a month after the “trespassing”.

78 has respect for the rule of law, especially when it's defined by corrupt judges and he's on the side of the law breakers.

Edited July 2 by homersapien

[AUFAN78 4,130]

6 hours ago, auburnatl1 said:

Quite a bad ass

Definitely not a lubed a$$.

[Son of A Tiger 648]