Hunter pleads guilty

[TexasTiger 14,523]

This will satisfy few on the right who seem to think he should get life for crimes they can’t articulate or substantiate, but here it is:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2023/06/20/hunter-biden-plea-deal/?utm_source=alert&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=wp_news_alert_revere&location=alert

[CoffeeTiger 5,957]

Gottem!

[aubiefifty 18,444]

they will not need any viagra on the right today boys! tell me i am lying.....you know it to be true.

[TexasTiger 14,523]

Hunter

[TitanTiger 21,558]

Weird how when you plead guilty and hand over evidence and documents, the sentence is usually lighter and the entire thing comes to an end, whereas when you obfuscate, lie, withhold evidence, go on air and cry like a bitch about unfair treatment and witch hunts while admitting to many of the charges against you, it drags on endlessly so you can fundraise on it.  ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 

[I_M4_AU 9,051]

7 minutes ago, TitanTiger said:

go on air and cry like a bitch about unfair treatment and witch hunts while admitting to many of the charges against you,

Could you imagine being his lawyer during the interview with Bret Baier?

[TitanTiger 21,558]

Just now, I_M4_AU said:

Could you imagine being his lawyer during the interview with Bret Baier?

Can you imagine being one of his voters should he win the GOP nomination?

[I_M4_AU 9,051]

17 minutes ago, TitanTiger said:

Can you imagine being one of his voters should he win the GOP nomination?

Not counting on it.

[TitanTiger 21,558]

34 minutes ago, I_M4_AU said:

Not counting on it.

He's still the prohibitive favorite.

[Mikey 16,781]

17 hours ago, TitanTiger said:

Can you imagine being one of his voters should he win the GOP nomination?

Depends on who his opponent is. I'll vote Trump over Biden or the giggling hyena.

Edited June 21, 2023 by Mikey

[TitanTiger 21,558]

2 hours ago, Mikey said:

Depends on who his opponent is. I'll vote Trump over Biden or the giggling hyena.

In other words, he was right...he could murder someone on 5th Avenue and not lose voters.

[TitanTiger 21,558]

If you think your opponent is vulnerable because he is a very old guy who says bizarre things and has influence-peddling immediate family, maybe the best way to take advantage is to not nominate a very old guy who says bizarre things and has influence-peddling immediate family.

(borrowed from Twitter)

[homersapien 12,310]

2 hours ago, TitanTiger said:

In other words, he was right...he could murder someone on 5th Avenue and not lose voters.

Well, not lose Mikey.

[Mikey 16,781]

13 hours ago, TitanTiger said:

In other words, he was right...he could murder someone on 5th Avenue and not lose voters.

He's already lost my vote in the primary. However, if he wins the nomination and his opponent is Bungling Biden, the giggling hyena or some other doofus such as frequent the Democratic party then yes, MAGA all the way.

I said back in 2020 that people were looking in the wrong direction. Just forget Trump for one day and look at the disaster that happens if Trump isn't elected. The same applies today. If you like record inflation, international embarrassment, high gas prices, uncontrolled inflation, uncontrolled borders and the many other disasters that the Dems have brought down on America, then fixate on Trump. If you don't like those things, then find someone who will correct those tragedies.

[Mikey 16,781]

12 hours ago, TitanTiger said:

If you think your opponent is vulnerable because he is a very old guy who says bizarre things and has influence-peddling immediate family, maybe the best way to take advantage is to not nominate a very old guy who says bizarre things and has influence-peddling immediate family.

(borrowed from Twitter)

But if both are nominated, then best to vote for the one whose policies are pro-American. Like it or not, that would be Trump.

[AU9377 6,109]

12 hours ago, Mikey said:

He's already lost my vote in the primary. However, if he wins the nomination and his opponent is Bungling Biden, the giggling hyena or some other doofus such as frequent the Democratic party then yes, MAGA all the way.

I said back in 2020 that people were looking in the wrong direction. Just forget Trump for one day and look at the disaster that happens if Trump isn't elected. The same applies today. If you like record inflation, international embarrassment, high gas prices, uncontrolled inflation, uncontrolled borders and the many other disasters that the Dems have brought down on America, then fixate on Trump. If you don't like those things, then find someone who will correct those tragedies.

The Trump economic policy would be another massive corporate tax cut combined with increasing the national debt by whatever amounts necessary without any meaningful budget cuts.  The only thing that has changed since Trump was actually living on Pennsylvania Avenue is a a better relationship with our allies around the globe.  International embarrassment is what we were when Trump was President.

We had a border problem during, before and after Trump's 4 years.  Inflation would have been the same had Trump been President.

[AU9377 6,109]

12 hours ago, Mikey said:

But if both are nominated, then best to vote for the one whose policies are pro-American. Like it or not, that would be Trump.

You mean the guy that supports dictators around the globe over people fighting for democracy.

[I_M4_AU 9,051]

2 minutes ago, AU9377 said:

You mean the guy that supports dictators around the globe over people fighting for democracy.

Do you mean the guy that is letting a dictator establish a military base within 100 miles from our shores?  How far we have fallen in just 2 and a half years.

[icanthearyou 4,468]

6 minutes ago, I_M4_AU said:

Do you mean the guy that is letting a dictator establish a military base within 100 miles from our shores?  How far we have fallen in just 2 and a half years.

Yeah, let's go to war with China in Cuba.  Great idea. 

Time to end the sanctions on Cuba.

The irrational fear of communism in Cuba is ridiculous.

[I_M4_AU 9,051]

9 minutes ago, icanthearyou said:

Yeah, let's go to war with China in Cuba.  Great idea. 

Time to end the sanctions on Cuba.

The irrational fear of communism in Cuba is ridiculous.

This is the reaction a weak president would take and that is the point.  When there was a Russian base in Cuba with nukes a Democratic President negotiated a disarmament of the nukes in 1962.

During the Cuban Missile Crisis, leaders of the U.S. and the Soviet Union engaged in a tense, 13-day political and military standoff in October 1962 over the installation of nuclear-armed Soviet missiles on Cuba, just 90 miles from U.S. shores. In a TV address on October 22, 1962, President John F. Kennedy (1917-63) notified Americans about the presence of the missiles, explained his decision to enact a naval blockade around Cuba and made it clear the U.S. was prepared to use military force if necessary to neutralize this perceived threat to national security. Following this news, many people feared the world was on the brink of nuclear war. However, disaster was avoided when the U.S. agreed to Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev’s (1894-1971) offer to remove the Cuban missiles in exchange for the U.S. promising not to invade Cuba. Kennedy also secretly agreed to remove U.S. missiles from Turkey.

https://www.history.com/topics/cold-war/cuban-missile-crisis

The Russians subsequently left Cuba and it is inconceivable that the US government would sit by and let another adversary to attempt to establish a base so close to the US. It’s not about Cuba and their socialism, we have lived with that for decades.  It’s about a more powerful, fully communist government that is capable of harm to the US.

Why would China believe they could accomplish such a feat?  Let’s see; Biden gives up, in spectacular fashion, in Afghanistan including giving up an airfield that was the closest to China we have ever had.  Biden has allowed a China spy balloon traverse the US and not shooting it down until it finished its mission. And last, but not least, our military interest is focusing on Ukraine with all the associated financial support that China, I’m sure, feels economically Biden is too weak to put up any resistance.

Time for a naval and airport blockade.

Every day you show you are a Marxist.  It would be interesting for you to run your own country.

[CoffeeTiger 5,957]

5 minutes ago, I_M4_AU said:

This is the reaction a weak president would take and that is the point.  When there was a Russian base in Cuba with nukes a Democratic President negotiated a disarmament of the nukes in 1962.

During the Cuban Missile Crisis, leaders of the U.S. and the Soviet Union engaged in a tense, 13-day political and military standoff in October 1962 over the installation of nuclear-armed Soviet missiles on Cuba, just 90 miles from U.S. shores. In a TV address on October 22, 1962, President John F. Kennedy (1917-63) notified Americans about the presence of the missiles, explained his decision to enact a naval blockade around Cuba and made it clear the U.S. was prepared to use military force if necessary to neutralize this perceived threat to national security. Following this news, many people feared the world was on the brink of nuclear war. However, disaster was avoided when the U.S. agreed to Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev’s (1894-1971) offer to remove the Cuban missiles in exchange for the U.S. promising not to invade Cuba. Kennedy also secretly agreed to remove U.S. missiles from Turkey.

https://www.history.com/topics/cold-war/cuban-missile-crisis

The Russians subsequently left Cuba and it is inconceivable that the US government would sit by and let another adversary to attempt to establish a base so close to the US. It’s not about Cuba and their socialism, we have lived with that for decades.  It’s about a more powerful, fully communist government that is capable of harm to the US.

Why would China believe they could accomplish such a feat?  Let’s see; Biden gives up, in spectacular fashion, in Afghanistan including giving up an airfield that was the closest to China we have ever had.  Biden has allowed a China spy balloon traverse the US and not shooting it down until it finished its mission. And last, but not least, our military interest is focusing on Ukraine with all the associated financial support that China, I’m sure, feels economically Biden is too weak to put up any resistance.

Time for a naval and airport blockade.

Every day you show you are a Marxist.  It would be interesting for you to run your own country.

https://apnews.com/article/china-cuba-spy-base-us-intelligence-0f655b577ae4141bdbeabc35d628b18f

It's being said that China's has spying operations in Cuba since Trumps term in 2019. 

[I_M4_AU 9,051]

19 hours ago, CoffeeTiger said:

https://apnews.com/article/china-cuba-spy-base-us-intelligence-0f655b577ae4141bdbeabc35d628b18f

It's being said that China's has spying operations in Cuba since Trumps term in 2019. 

Of course they did, it’s all Trump’s fault.  The point; is this weak president shows no resistance to a BASE being established in Cuba.

Edited June 23, 2023 by I_M4_AU

[Mikey 16,781]

11 hours ago, AU9377 said:

We had a border problem during, before and after Trump's 4 years.  Inflation would have been the same had Trump been President.

No border problem like we have today. Biden sets new records for numbers of illegals daily.

Inflation would have been the same? That's nonsense. A major part of the current inflation is gas prices due to Biden's disastrous fossil energy policy. Follow that up with vast new give-aways and we have Biden responsible for the worst inflation in over 40 years.

You people don't really believe this stuff you write, do you? It's preposterous.

 

[homersapien 12,310]

11 hours ago, Mikey said:

No border problem like we have today. Biden sets new records for numbers of illegals daily.

Inflation would have been the same? That's nonsense. A major part of the current inflation is gas prices due to Biden's disastrous fossil energy policy. Follow that up with vast new give-aways and we have Biden responsible for the worst inflation in over 40 years.

You people don't really believe this stuff you write, do you? It's preposterous.

 

To mark Biden’s first year in office, we take stock of how the U.S. has performed under the new president. Here are some highlights:

• The U.S. economy added 6.2 million jobs since January 2021, but not all of the jobs lost during the pandemic have returned.
• Economic growth slowed in the third quarter, but economists estimate the economy grew by about 5% in 2021 — the fastest in decades.
• A key measurement of illegal immigration rose dramatically. The number of apprehensions at the border with Mexico increased by 317% in Biden’s first 10 full months in office, compared with the same period in 2020.
• Inflation came roaring back. During Biden’s first 11 months in office, the Consumer Price Index increased 6.8%. Gasoline prices jumped 39%.
• Wages and inflation are both up. But real weekly wages, adjusted for inflation, declined 2.2% for production and nonsupervisory workers.
• Corporate profits and stock prices hit new records.
• The number of people without health insurance went down by about 500,000, according to a government survey.
• The U.S. trade deficit, which grew larger under President Donald Trump, continued to increase. The gap grew 27.3% in Biden’s first 10 months.
• The number of people receiving food stamp benefits declined by about 905,000, or 2.2%, after steep increases during the height of the pandemic.
• The federal debt continues to rise, and annual deficits remained in the trillions.
• Biden has kept pace with Trump’s first year in winning confirmation of federal appeals court judges, and exceeded his predecessor in District Court confirmations.
• The U.S. image abroad has recovered. In 12 nations, many of which are key U.S. allies and partners, a median of 62% of foreigners said they held a positive view of the U.S. — up from a median of 34% in Trump’s final year.

https://www.factcheck.org/2022/01/bidens-numbers/

 

More recent data on inflation:

The annual inflation rate for the United States was 4.0% for the 12 months ended May, according to U.S. Labor Department data published on June 13, 2023. This follows a rise of 4.9% in the previous period. The next update on inflation is scheduled for release on July 12 at 8:30 a.m. ET. It will provide information on the rate of inflation for the 12 months ended June 2023.

https://www.factcheck.org/2022/01/bidens-numbers/

 

[aubiefifty 18,444]

22 hours ago, I_M4_AU said:

This is the reaction a weak president would take and that is the point.  When there was a Russian base in Cuba with nukes a Democratic President negotiated a disarmament of the nukes in 1962.

During the Cuban Missile Crisis, leaders of the U.S. and the Soviet Union engaged in a tense, 13-day political and military standoff in October 1962 over the installation of nuclear-armed Soviet missiles on Cuba, just 90 miles from U.S. shores. In a TV address on October 22, 1962, President John F. Kennedy (1917-63) notified Americans about the presence of the missiles, explained his decision to enact a naval blockade around Cuba and made it clear the U.S. was prepared to use military force if necessary to neutralize this perceived threat to national security. Following this news, many people feared the world was on the brink of nuclear war. However, disaster was avoided when the U.S. agreed to Soviet leader Nikita Khrushchev’s (1894-1971) offer to remove the Cuban missiles in exchange for the U.S. promising not to invade Cuba. Kennedy also secretly agreed to remove U.S. missiles from Turkey.

https://www.history.com/topics/cold-war/cuban-missile-crisis

The Russians subsequently left Cuba and it is inconceivable that the US government would sit by and let another adversary to attempt to establish a base so close to the US. It’s not about Cuba and their socialism, we have lived with that for decades.  It’s about a more powerful, fully communist government that is capable of harm to the US.

Why would China believe they could accomplish such a feat?  Let’s see; Biden gives up, in spectacular fashion, in Afghanistan including giving up an airfield that was the closest to China we have ever had.  Biden has allowed a China spy balloon traverse the US and not shooting it down until it finished its mission. And last, but not least, our military interest is focusing on Ukraine with all the associated financial support that China, I’m sure, feels economically Biden is too weak to put up any resistance.

Time for a naval and airport blockade.

Every day you show you are a Marxist.  It would be interesting for you to run your own country.

no they think we are detracted by all the repuke bullcrap that has been going on for a year or three now. hell your side is not doing squat they just want some kind of revenge.