Jump to content

Journalists Defend Matt Taibbi After House Democrat Sends Him Letter Warning of Five-Year Prison Sentence For Perjury


Auburn85

Recommended Posts

https://www.mediaite.com/news/journalists-defend-matt-taibbi-after-house-democrat-sends-him-letter-warning-of-five-year-prison-sentence-for-perjury/


 

Quote

 

 

The ranking member of the House Judiciary Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, Del. Stacey Plaskett (D-VI), raised eyebrows on Thursday after she sent independent journalist Matt Taibbi a letter asking if he would like to correct his under-oath testimony before her committee and noted the five-year jail sentence for perjury.

Plaskett noted an error Taibbi made in his ‘Twitter Files’ reporting, which was very publicly called out by MSNBC’s Mehdi Hasan. Taibbi acknowledged the error – mistaking the government’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency with the privately run Center for Internet Security – and issued a correction.

In her letter, Plaskett argues that Taibbi’s Congressional testimony was “contradicted by your own admission.”

“While these inaccuracies may seem minor to you, they could lead Congress to rely on inaccurate testimony in considering and/or passing new legislation which would impact all Americans. In light of the potential for such serious consequences, I would like to offer you the opportunity to correct your statements before the panel,” she added.

Her letter concluded by noting Taibbi had signed a document certifying he would tell the truth and the legal ramifications for not doing so:

Prior to your appearance before the subcommittee on March 9, you signed the Judiciary Committee’s Truth in Testimony form, certifying that you understand that ‘knowingly providing material false information to this committee/subcommittee or knowingly concealing material information from this committee/subcommittee, is a crime (18 U.S.C. 1001).

In addition, at the beginning of the March 9 hearing, you swore ‘under penalty of perjury that the testimony you [were] about to give [was] true and correct to the best of your knowledge, information, and belief.’ Under the federal perjury statue, 18 U.S.C. 1621, proving false information is punishable by up to five years’ imprisonment.

The letter laying out the punishment for perjury prompted a backlash online from some prominent journalists. The Intercept’s Ryan Grim commented, “Dem Rep. Stacey Plaskett is threatening @mtaibbi with prison over his Twitter Files testimony. The testimony is actually accurate-though she’s referring to an error in a tweet that’s been corrected.”

 

“That’s beside the point: To call for a reporter to be jailed is beyond the pale,” Grim argued and also called for Plaskett to resign.

Former CNN media reporter Brian Stelter also blasted the letter, writing, “Lawmakers should not be sending these kinds of letters to journalists. Ironic this is from a “weaponization” committee member.”

 

Lee Fang, a journalist who also worked on the “Twitter Files,” reported on the letter and added, “Mehdi’s viral deception that Taibbi lied under oath about DHS/CISA now has House Dems explicitly threatening Taibbi w/ imprisonment. Taibbi was accurate in this quote, yet here’s a letter from Rep. Stacey Plaskett citing Mehdi to float a threat of 5 years of jail against Taibbi.”

 

Fang also reported that Seth Stern, the director of advocacy with the Freedom of the Press Foundation, immediately condemned the letter. “It’s disturbing that a member of Congress would attempt to threaten a journalist with imprisonment for summarizing his reporting during a congressional hearing It seems apparent that she had no good faith basis to threaten a perjury prosecution and that the threat is an intimidation tactic,” Stern said in a statement.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites





That doesn’t help, Congresswoman. 

Edited by AUDub
  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Talk about swatting a fly with a sledgehammer. It was an error that he genuinely seemed mistaken about, not trying to lie, that he corrected. Idiotic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, TitanTiger said:

Talk about swatting a fly with a sledgehammer. It was an error that he genuinely seemed mistaken about, not trying to lie, that he corrected. Idiotic

Which, by definition, means he can't be convicted of perjury.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, icanthearyou said:

Don't even know what to say.  Wrong, dumb, arrogant, abusive, maniacal...

Reminds one of Republican behavior

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, 1716AU said:

Reminds one of Republican behavior

 i agree with fervor

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/21/2023 at 8:17 PM, icanthearyou said:

Don't even know what to say.  Wrong, dumb, arrogant, abusive, maniacal...

Folks have said worse about her character, but you are on point. How do these people get in congress? Who would vote for her? One can only assume those with similar characteristic traits. So sad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

i do not care for matts politics but he used to write for rolling stone and he was highly respected. i did bit read the story because i figured at wort he might have made a mistake. i am so sick of people not liking something someone says so they trash them over and over instead of just disagreeing.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, aubiefifty said:

i do not care for matts politics but he used to write for rolling stone and he was highly respected. i did bit read the story because i figured at wort he might have made a mistake. i am so sick of people not liking something someone says so they trash them over and over instead of just disagreeing.

Welcome to my world. On this forum, it is seen over and over, posters will find anything they disagree with someone, no matter how small, and then just dismiss them. No discourse, no Free Exchange of Ideas. Goebbels would be so proud.

The real problem here is that some of the more prominent posters here actually agree with the overreach. They cannot tolerate anyone that disagrees with them. If we polled them now: They would want Taiibi prosecuted because he showed the world how cockeyed Censorship in America has gotten. 

Edited by DKW 86
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...