Leaker Is An Environmental Extremist

[Proud Tiger 4,261]

I won't call any names but the leaker of top secret info just caught is an environmental nut case like some here.Her name is Reality Winner but that is funny since she is clearly a LOSER.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/06/who-is-reality-winner-accused-leaker-wanted-to-resist-trump.html

[AUDub 11,784]

25 minutes ago, Proud Tiger said:

I won't call any names but the leaker of top secret info just caught is an environmental nut case like some here.Her name is Reality Winner but that is funny since she is clearly a LOSER.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/06/who-is-reality-winner-accused-leaker-wanted-to-resist-trump.html

She revealed what amounts to an act of war against our republic, and you are hung up on ad hominems.

[homersapien 12,172]

42 minutes ago, Proud Tiger said:

I won't call any names but the leaker of top secret info just caught is an environmental nut case like some here.Her name is Reality Winner but that is funny since she is clearly a LOSER.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/06/who-is-reality-winner-accused-leaker-wanted-to-resist-trump.html

She's a veteran who loves her country more than our narcissitic psychopath president.

 

[Proud Tiger 4,261]

3 hours ago, Bigbens42 said:

She revealed what amounts to an act of war against our republic, and you are hung up on ad hominems.

Funny you didn't have that view of Hillary for e-mailing secret info. But I know, that's different so don't waste your time spinning it.

[homersapien 12,172]

1 hour ago, Proud Tiger said:

Funny you didn't have that view of Hillary for e-mailing secret info. But I know, that's different so don't waste your time spinning it.

What secret info did Hillary compromise?  

[homersapien 12,172]

And you hardly need to be an "extremist" to oppose Trump's environmental policies.  Most Americans do.

[AUDub 11,784]

2 hours ago, Proud Tiger said:

Funny you didn't have that view of Hillary for e-mailing secret info. But I know, that's different so don't waste your time spinning it.

Ah, yes. Buttery males. Proud's new favorite subject.

[alexava 6,974]

I thought I knew what 'extremist ' meant. 

[homersapien 12,172]

25 minutes ago, alexava said:

I thought I knew what 'extremist ' meant. 

Seriously.  Their ranks have now expanded exponentially.  

[Proud Tiger 4,261]

17 hours ago, Bigbens42 said:

Ah, yes. Buttery males. Proud's new favorite subject.

You fully met my expectations.

[quietfan 233]

I am grateful to have the information Ms. Winner is accused of leaking regarding improper Russian attempts to influence our elections.  I also acknowledge that in this country no one is above the law, neither her nor our President, and therefore she must face the consequences of her actions.  

But her environmental beliefs are irrelevant to the question of Russian meddling, and pejoratives like "environmental nut case" or "Loser" are nothing more than offensive ad hominem attacks that contribute nothing to the debate.                                           

[AUDub 11,784]

1 hour ago, Proud Tiger said:

You fully met my expectations.

As did you. No serious attempt at discussing the implications of the leak. Only ad hominems and deflections. Typical.

[Proud Tiger 4,261]

37 minutes ago, Bigbens42 said:

As did you. No serious attempt at discussing the implications of the leak. Only ad hominems and deflections. Typical.

I report for intelligent discussion. You should try it sometime without just responding with your little insults..

[quietfan 233]

48 minutes ago, Proud Tiger said:

I report for intelligent discussion. You should try it sometime without just responding with your little insults..

The first insults thrown around in this thread were "nut job" and "LOSER" in the opening post.

For what it's worth, I don't like insults from anyone, on either side of a discussion.

[homersapien 12,172]

56 minutes ago, Proud Tiger said:

I report for intelligent discussion. You should try it sometime without just responding with your little insults..

Irony

[Proud Tiger 4,261]

18 minutes ago, quietfan said:

The first insults thrown around in this thread were "nut job" and "LOSER" in the opening post.

For what it's worth, I don't like insults from anyone, on either side of a discussion.

IMHO she deserved those insults for what she did.

[AUDub 11,784]

4 hours ago, quietfan said:

I am grateful to have the information Ms. Winner is accused of leaking regarding improper Russian attempts to influence our elections.  I also acknowledge that in this country no one is above the law, neither her nor our President, and therefore she must face the consequences of her actions.

I'm not quite sure what to think of her yet. 

[AUDub 11,784]

2 hours ago, Proud Tiger said:

I report for intelligent discussion. You should try it sometime without just responding with your little insults..

If you reported for intelligent discussion, your OP failed miserably. 

[quietfan 233]

7 hours ago, Proud Tiger said:

IMHO she deserved those insults for what she did.

I respect your right to your opinion.  I don't see how calling someone an 'environmental nut job' or a 'loser' contributes to a discussion of the alleged leaking and/or alleged Russian meddling, but I respect your freedom of speech and hence your right to use such words even while I question the appropriateness of doing so.  (Whether such insults could be considered libel or slander is between you, Ms. Winner, and the courts.  I'm no lawyer, but that would seem like quite a stretch to me.)

However I was just pointing out the seeming hypocrisy of criticizing others for "insults" when you opened the thread with two.

[Proud Tiger 4,261]

5 hours ago, Bigbens42 said:

If you reported for intelligent discussion, your OP failed miserably. 

Is that my fault....or YOURS? Whe derailed the thread?

[Proud Tiger 4,261]

23 minutes ago, quietfan said:

I respect your right to your opinion.  I don't see how calling someone an 'environmental nut job' or a 'loser' contributes to a discussion of the alleged leaking and/or alleged Russian meddling, but I respect your freedom of speech and hence your right to use such words even while I question the appropriateness of doing so.  (Whether such insults could be considered libel or slander is between you, Ms. Winner, and the courts.  I'm no lawyer, but that would seem like quite a stretch to me.)

However I was just pointing out the seeming hypocrisy of criticizing others for "insults" when you opened the thread with two.

Thanks. But please note I made disparaging comments about a woman who was arrested for leaking info potentially info damaging to our country, not to anyone here. But if you real all the posts here you will see some who fling insults on a routine basis.

[AUDub 11,784]

31 minutes ago, Proud Tiger said:

Thanks. But please note I made disparaging comments about a woman who was arrested for leaking info potentially info damaging to our country, not to anyone here. But if you real all the posts here you will see some who fling insults on a routine basis.

Yeah we weren't born yesterday. 

On June 6, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Proud Tiger said:

..is an environmental nut case like some here....

We know exactly who you meant with that remark. 

[homersapien 12,172]

1 hour ago, Proud Tiger said:

Thanks. But please note I made disparaging comments about a woman who was arrested for leaking info potentially info damaging to our country, not to anyone here. But if you real all the posts here you will see some who fling insults on a routine basis.

That's against the rules.  Trust me.   

[Proud Tiger 4,261]

10 hours ago, Bigbens42 said:

Yeah we weren't born yesterday. 

We know exactly who you meant with that remark. 

I guess the shoe fit.

[AUUSN 823]

Great read 

 

https://arstechnica.com/security/2017/06/how-a-few-yellow-dots-burned-the-intercepts-nsa-leaker/