Jump to content

Sorry Folks it wasn't an AR-15


AU-24

Recommended Posts

homer - yours is truly the stupid post. There is no double standard. There is a GLOBAL murder fest going on , all in the name of Allah, and your pathetic attempt to paint 1 or 2 " Christians " ( which they aren't ) as some sort of quid pro quo in a juvenile and idiotic attempt to paint all religion under the same umbrella, and there by side step the real root cause here.

Militant Islamic Fundamentalism.

You're too much of a coward, like Obama, to say it.

You're making ME pay for YOUR own displays of ignorance ?

Wow... don't throw me in the brier patch. Don't do it !!

:roflol:/>

I have no problem with saying that radical Islamists are responsible for whatever they do, so quit lying.

I also understand as POTUS why I would be reluctant to fan the flames of mindless prejudice by attaching the name of a religion to atrocities committed by crazy fanatics. It would be counterproductive.

Likewise, you don't hear the term "Christian terrorists" very often when Christian wackos commit such acts. Why tar Christianity with the acts of a fanatic?

You are a weaseling liar and a total embarrassment to this forum, much less Auburn University. Go away.

Where in the Bible does it say to kill all non Christians? Where does it discuss the Christian reward for murdering Christians? Where does it state women are not men's equal and should in some cases be enslaved?
Link to comment
Share on other sites





  • Replies 73
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Muhammad's special marriage privileges

Moreover, it seems that Allah gave Muhammad special permission to marry as many women as he desired or take them as slaves or concubines, just as in the pre—Islamic days of ignorance.

The Quran in Sura 33:50, a lengthy verse, grants Muhammad wide latitude in his marriages:

O Prophet, We have made lawful to you those of your wives, whose dowers you have paid, and those women who come into your possession out of the slave—girls granted by Allah, and the daughters of your paternal uncles and aunts, and of your maternal uncles and aunts, who have migrated with you, and the believing woman who gives herself to the Prophet, if the Prophet may desire her. This privilege is for you only, not for the other believers . . . . (Maududi vol. 4, p. 111, emphasis added).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no problem with saying that radical Islamists are responsible for whatever they do, so quit lying.

you do, and I'm not lying.

I also understand as POTUS why I would be reluctant to fan the flames of mindless prejudice by attaching the name of a religion to atrocities committed by crazy fanatics. It would be counterproductive.

The flames are already fanned, and the presumption that calling the killers who they themselves profess to be by their name would make things some how worse is laughable. NOT calling them who they are hasn't abated the violence, rape and murder, has it ? A change must be made. A TRUE change, not some damn bumper sticker slogan which means less than the adhesive or t-shirt on which it's printed.

Likewise, you don't hear the term "Christian terrorists" very often when Christian wackos commit such acts. Why tar Christianity with the acts of a fanatic?

Actually. in the extremely rare instances where some abortion bomber does something horrific, it IS reported as either a fundamentalist Christian, or ' Religious Right " was the one who committed the crime.

Problem for you is that these events are very few and far between, so they don't warrant any mention w/ militant Islam.

You are a weaseling liar and a total embarrassment to this forum, much less Auburn University. Go away.

More empty ad hominems when you know you're wrong, have nothing of any substance to add, or can't defend your comments w/ facts, logic or any combination and are beaten.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Husbands may hit their wives even if the husbands merely fear highhandedness in their wives (quite apart from whether they actually are highhanded).

The Quran in Sura 4:34 says:

4:34 . . . If you fear highhandedness from your wives, remind them [of the teaching of God], then ignore them when you go to bed, then hit them. If they obey you, you have no right to act against them. God is most high and great. (Haleem, emphasis added)

The hadith says that Muslim women in the time of Muhammad were suffering from domestic violence in the context of confusing marriage

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mature men are allowed to marry prepubescent girls.

The Quran in Sura 65:1, 4 says:

65:1 O Prophet, when you [and the believers] divorce women, divorce them for their prescribed waiting—period and count the waiting—period accurately . . . 4 And if you are in doubt about those of your women who have despaired of menstruation, (you should know that) their waiting period is three months, and the same applies to those who have not menstruated as yet. As for pregnant women, their period ends when they have delivered their burden. (Maududi, vol. 5, pp. 599 and 617, emphasis added)

Maududi correctly interprets the plain meaning of verse 4, which appears in the context of divorce:

Therefore, making mention of the waiting—period for girls who have not yet menstruated, clearly proves that it is not only permissible to give away the girl at this age but it is permissible for the husband to consummate marriage with her. Now, obviously no Muslim has the right to forbid a thing which the Qur'an has held as permissible. (Maududi, vol. 5, p. 620, note 13, emphasis added)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A husband has sex with his wife, as a plow goes into a field.

The Quran in Sura (Chapter) 2:223 says:

Your women are your fields, so go into your fields whichever way you like . . . . (MAS Abdel Haleem,
The Qur'an
, Oxford UP, 2004)

We should make no mistake about this verse. It includes sexual positions. In a footnote to this verse, Haleem says that Muslims in Medina heard from the Jews that 'a child born from a woman approached from behind would have a squint.'

The hadith are the reports of Muhammad's words and actions outside of the Quran. Two reliable hadith collectors and editors are Bukhari (d. 870), Muslim (d. 875). The hadith come only second in importance and sacredness among the vast majority of Muslims around the world. Since the hadith is explicit, the readers are invited to click here and read for themselves, at their own discretion: Muslim nos. 3363—3365. See these parallel hadith here and here.

We should have no doubt that the husband controlled their sex life. If a woman does not want to have sex, then angels curse her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Islam is a copy cat religious cult, modeled after older religious cults, set up as a ruse and an excuse to dominate the world and have it submit to an Arabic world view.

No thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there was ever a thread that needed to be locked...

Go find your safe space. And if you're lucky, a :grouphug: too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

homer - yours is truly the stupid post. There is no double standard. There is a GLOBAL murder fest going on , all in the name of Allah, and your pathetic attempt to paint 1 or 2 " Christians " ( which they aren't ) as some sort of quid pro quo in a juvenile and idiotic attempt to paint all religion under the same umbrella, and there by side step the real root cause here.

Militant Islamic Fundamentalism.

You're too much of a coward, like Obama, to say it.

You're making ME pay for YOUR own displays of ignorance ?

Wow... don't throw me in the brier patch. Don't do it !!

:roflol:/>

I have no problem with saying that radical Islamists are responsible for whatever they do, so quit lying.

I also understand as POTUS why I would be reluctant to fan the flames of mindless prejudice by attaching the name of a religion to atrocities committed by crazy fanatics. It would be counterproductive.

Likewise, you don't hear the term "Christian terrorists" very often when Christian wackos commit such acts. Why tar Christianity with the acts of a fanatic?

You are a weaseling liar and a total embarrassment to this forum, much less Auburn University. Go away.

Where in the Bible does it say to kill all non Christians? Where does it discuss the Christian reward for murdering Christians? Where does it state women are not men's equal and should in some cases be enslaved?

If you are a fanatical loser, there's plenty of stuff in the bible to justify your actions. Given the right circumstances, there would be a lot more.

http://www.alternet....right-white-men

And lets not forget how slavery and the following apartheid were justified through "holy" scripture.

If you really want to make this all about religion, you are part of the problem.

As far as I am concerned, I wish all true believers - of whatever religion - would just disappear. The world would be better off for it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If there was ever a thread that needed to be locked...

Go find your safe space. And if you're lucky, a :grouphug:/> too.

Lol. Ok. You want to fight....You want attention...awwwww

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Islam is a copy cat religious cult, modeled after older religious cults, set up as a ruse and an excuse to dominate the world and have it submit to an Arabic world view.

No thanks.

Says the atheist. :-\

And Christianity is.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whining about threads being locked isn't a pathetic cry for attention ?

LOL SMH Yeah, right. OK, what ever !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A husband has sex with his wife, as a plow goes into a field.

The Quran in Sura (Chapter) 2:223 says:

Your women are your fields, so go into your fields whichever way you like . . . . (MAS Abdel Haleem,
The Qur'an
, Oxford UP, 2004)

We should make no mistake about this verse. It includes sexual positions. In a footnote to this verse, Haleem says that Muslims in Medina heard from the Jews that 'a child born from a woman approached from behind would have a squint.'

The hadith are the reports of Muhammad's words and actions outside of the Quran. Two reliable hadith collectors and editors are Bukhari (d. 870), Muslim (d. 875). The hadith come only second in importance and sacredness among the vast majority of Muslims around the world. Since the hadith is explicit, the readers are invited to click http://www.usc.edu/d...t.html#008.3363"%5Dhere%5B/url%5D and read for themselves, at their own discretion: Muslim nos. 3363—3365. See these parallel hadith %5Burl="http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/060.sbt.html#006.060.050"%5Dhere%5B/url%5D and %5Burl="http://www.usc.edu/dept/MSA/fundamentals/hadithsunnah/bukhari/060.sbt.html#006.060.051"%5Dhere%5B/url%5D.

We should have no doubt that the husband controlled their sex life. If a woman does not want to have sex, then angels curse her.

So do you think Islam is un American? Should we force Muslims out?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Islam is a copy cat religious cult, modeled after older religious cults, set up as a ruse and an excuse to dominate the world and have it submit to an Arabic world view.

No thanks.

Says the atheist. :-\

And Christianity is.....

An older cult, genius. Good grief, you're slow.

At least Christianity, Judaism and EVERY OTHER RELIGION has gone through at least some form of growing up stage where it doesn't overtly preach the butchering of those who don't believe their cult views.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So do you think Islam is un American? Should we force Muslims out?

Sharia law directly conflicts w/ the US Constitution and the ideals on which this country was founded.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have no problem with saying that radical Islamists are responsible for whatever they do, so quit lying.

you do, and I'm not lying.

I also understand as POTUS why I would be reluctant to fan the flames of mindless prejudice by attaching the name of a religion to atrocities committed by crazy fanatics. It would be counterproductive.

The flames are already fanned, and the presumption that calling the killers who they themselves profess to be by their name would make things some how worse is laughable. NOT calling them who they are hasn't abated the violence, rape and murder, has it ? A change must be made. A TRUE change, not some damn bumper sticker slogan which means less than the adhesive or t-shirt on which it's printed.

Likewise, you don't hear the term "Christian terrorists" very often when Christian wackos commit such acts. Why tar Christianity with the acts of a fanatic?

Actually. in the extremely rare instances where some abortion bomber does something horrific, it IS reported as either a fundamentalist Christian, or ' Religious Right " was the one who committed the crime.

Problem for you is that these events are very few and far between, so they don't warrant any mention w/ militant Islam.

You are a weaseling liar and a total embarrassment to this forum, much less Auburn University. Go away.

More empty ad hominems when you know you're wrong, have nothing of any substance to add, or can't defend your comments w/ facts, logic or any combination and are beaten.

Liar.

Non-Muslims Carried Out More than 90% of All Terrorist Attacks in America

http://www.globalresearch.ca/non-muslims-carried-out-more-than-90-of-all-terrorist-attacks-in-america/5333619

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So do you think Islam is un American? Should we force Muslims out?

Sharia law directly conflicts w/ the US Constitution and the ideals on which this country was founded.

So is Dominionism.

I didn't say anything about Sharia DA. Answer the question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Liar.

Non-Muslims Carried Out More than 90% of All Terrorist Attacks in America

http://www.globalres...america/5333619

How am I a liar ? You've demonstrated exactly nothing which proves I am in any way " lying " about this or any other topic.

And this stat you posted ? What the hell ? It has zero to do w/ the discussion at hand !

Keep digging that hole you're standing in. :roflol:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Raptor, whenever you get tired of Homer refuting your garbage arguments, and whenever you can stop using ad hominums, then you can wear your big boy diapers and talk civilly with the rest of the group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Raptor, whenever you get tired of Homer refuting your garbage arguments, and whenever you can stop using ad hominums, then you can wear your big boy diapers and talk civilly with the rest of the group.

Will NEVER happen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So do you think Islam is un American? Should we force Muslims out?

Sharia law directly conflicts w/ the US Constitution and the ideals on which this country was founded.

Didn't say anything about Sharia DA. Answer the question.

I'm not a district attorney, but i'll answer anyway.

Those who wish to live under Shariah Law , while ignoring the US Constitution, ought to be banned from living here, imo. Those who are cool w/ praying to allah and going to mosque and living their lives as they like, welcome to the country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I've seen some pretty dumb threads but this one? Wow.

"Hey Ya'll it wasnt an AR15..... it was worse! Aint I smart?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Raptor, whenever you get tired of Homer refuting your garbage arguments, and whenever you can stop using ad hominums, then you can wear your big boy diapers and talk civilly with the rest of the group.

jeff , you've got it 100% backwards.

To date, all homer has done is tossed ad hominems my way and interjected non sequiturs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.




×
×
  • Create New...