The smearing of Dr. Soon, climate change denier

[Weegle777 78]

It's already been offered multiple times, even in this thread. Search feature is your friend.

[AUDub 12,028]

It's already been offered multiple times, even in this thread. Search feature is your friend.

Do I have to do the research to support your silly claim?

[homersapien 12,387]

You only say that because it's a cause you are for.

:laugh:/>

Let's see proof that there are "just as many highly educated scientists providing evidence against GW as there are providing evidence for it."

You have been provided with tons of articles in this and many other threads in this forum with highly educated scientists who have researched the topic.

And without fail, when that proof is provided, simply because it goes against your beliefs, you regard it as nonsense, and "Oh, THAT particular scientist isn't credible!", or "THAT publication is just another denier journal!".

I'm prepared for the, "I don't understand this post." response.

Well you certainly don't understand what it takes to disprove a theory.

[Weegle777 78]

That's the problem guys. You are acting like,

"Huh? I haven't seen anybody provide any evidence against global warming."

The feigning ignorance shtick is getting old, and everyone here can see through it. You aren't fooling anyone.

[AUDub 12,028]

That's the problem guys. You are acting like,

"Huh? I haven't seen anybody provide any evidence against global warming."

The feigning ignorance shtick is getting old, and everyone here can see through it. You aren't fooling anyone.

Support this claim:

...has just as many highly educated scientists providing evidence against GW as there are providing evidence for it...