Wareagletd 0 Posted May 3, 2012 Share Posted May 3, 2012 IMO, if LSU had just "shown up" and played a close game vs. uat in the BCSNC game then there would have been a split title. But, LSU allowed uat to come into their own backyard and skull drag them up and down the field. IMO, they still would've crowned UAT champs, no matter how much they would win by. The funniest thing is though UAT fans wanted a rematch so bad, but if you ask them "When does LSU get their rematch?" they say they don't deserve/get/need one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
msg6367 1 Posted May 3, 2012 Share Posted May 3, 2012 The best part of it is that it took UA to win the BCS for them to realize it was screwed up. This is actually the third time the turds won a National Championship and the rules had to be changed afterwards because the turds should not have been the rightful winners. The other times were selecting NC before bowls were played and then the turds losing their bowl game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rockfordpi 91 Posted May 4, 2012 Share Posted May 4, 2012 The best part of it is that it took UA to win the BCS for them to realize it was screwed up. This is actually the third time the turds won a National Championship and the rules had to be changed afterwards because the turds should not have been the rightful winners. The other times were selecting NC before bowls were played and then the turds losing their bowl game. I wonder if we would have gotten a NC in 57 if they had awarded after bowl games? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
keesler 5,990 Posted May 7, 2012 Share Posted May 7, 2012 IMO, if LSU had just "shown up" and played a close game vs. uat in the BCSNC game then there would have been a split title. But, LSU allowed uat to come into their own backyard and skull drag them up and down the field. IMO, they still would've crowned UAT champs, no matter how much they would win by. The funniest thing is though UAT fans wanted a rematch so bad, but if you ask them "When does LSU get their rematch?" they say they don't deserve/get/need one. Hahaha -- that's funny, after that beatdown the corndogs took 4 months ago in their own backyard, in an embarrassing fashion, I wouldn't think LSU would ever want to see that same uat defense lined up across the field again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigbird 61,008 Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/football/ncaa/05/09/bcs-playoff-delany.ap/index.html?sct=cf_t2_a3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpwspringer 0 Posted May 11, 2012 Share Posted May 11, 2012 http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/football/ncaa/05/09/bcs-playoff-delany.ap/index.html?sct=cf_t2_a3 It is only logical. If you can't win your division... after all what is that asking, that you theoretically be the best of a SIX team division. That is six teams as in 1-2-3-4-5-SIX. That isn't a whole lot of teams. Seriously if the situation were reversed and it was an Auburn team instead of an Alabama team, we know what the story would have been. The story would have been you don't deserve it because you didn't win your division, you had your chance against LSU and blew it AND IT WOULD BE THE BAMMERS HOWLING IT THE LOUDEST! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BirdofPrey76 0 Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/football/ncaa/05/09/bcs-playoff-delany.ap/index.html?sct=cf_t2_a3 It is only logical. If you can't win your division... after all what is that asking, that you theoretically be the best of a SIX team division. That is six teams as in 1-2-3-4-5-SIX. That isn't a whole lot of teams. Seriously if the situation were reversed and it was an Auburn team instead of an Alabama team, we know what the story would have been. The story would have been you don't deserve it because you didn't win your division, you had your chance against LSU and blew it AND IT WOULD BE THE BAMMERS HOWLING IT THE LOUDEST! ^^EXACTLY^^ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rednilla 5,449 Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 The best part of it is that it took UA to win the BCS for them to realize it was screwed up. This is actually the third time the turds won a National Championship and the rules had to be changed afterwards because the turds should not have been the rightful winners. The other times were selecting NC before bowls were played and then the turds losing their bowl game. I wonder if we would have gotten a NC in 57 if they had awarded after bowl games? Probably not, but on the flip side we might well have won at least a share in 93 if it had been voted on pre-bowl. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pologuy24 0 Posted May 12, 2012 Share Posted May 12, 2012 Some teams don't even win their own division. They started off highly in the rankings, lose early, don't play a championship game and they might end up at four." lmao! That was a at Saban & Bama! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.