aubiefifty

holy cow arkie has a player named Bumper Pool and i am not kidding.

AUBURN, Alabama–Two seniors and one junior will join Auburn head coach Bryan Harsin at next week's 2022 Southeastern Conference Football Media Days in Atlanta. Senior edge rusher Derick Hall, senior tight end John Samuel Shenker and junior running back Tank Bigsby will represent the Tigers at the event that will be held at the College Football Hall of Fame. The event, which starts on Monday, will run through Thursday, which is the day Auburn will appear. Joining Auburn in the spotlight that Thursday is Tennessee and Texas A&M. LSU, Ole Miss and Missouri will get it started on Monday at 10 a.m. CDT. The day two lineup includes Alabama, Mississippi State, South Carolina and Vanderbilt. Day three includes Arkansas, Florida, Georgia and Kentucky. Attendees at the event will vote on preseason All-SEC teams and predict the order of finish of each team in the SEC West and SEC East divisions. Last year's media days picks to win the divisions, Alabama and Georgia, played for the league championship won by the Tide. Georgia won the rematch in the national championship game. Here are the scheduled player participants at the event: Alabama Will Anderson Jr., LB, Junior Jordan Battle, DB, Senior Bryce Young, QB, Junior Auburn Tank Bigsby, RB, Junior Derick Hall, Edge, Senior John Samuel Shenker, TE, Senior Arkansas Jalen Catalon, S, Junior KJ Jefferson, QB, Junior Bumper Pool, LB, Senior Auburn Tank Bigsby, RB, Junior Derick Hall, Edge, Senior John Samuel Shenker, TE, Senior Florida Anthony Richardson, QB, Sophomore Richard Gouraige, OL, Junior Ventrell Miller, LB, Senior Georgia Stetson Bennett, QB, Senior Nolan Smith, LB, Senior Sedrick Van Pran, OL, Sophomore Kentucky Will Levis, QB, Senior Kenneth Horsey, OG, Senior DeAndre Square, ILB, Senior LSU Jack Bech, WR, Sophomore Mike Jones, Jr., LB, Junior BJ Ojulari, DE, Junior Ole Miss Nick Broeker, OL, Senior Cedric Johnson, DE, Junior Jonathan Mingo, WR, Senior Mississippi State Jaden Crumedy, DT, Graduate Senior Nathaniel Watson, LB, Graduate Senior Austin Williams, WR, Graduate Senior Missouri Barrett Banister, WR, Graduate Senior Martez Manuel, DB, Senior Isaiah McGuire, DL, Senior South Carolina Jovaughn Gwyn, OL, Senior Dakereon Joyner, WR, Senior Zacch Pickens, DL, Senior Tennessee Trevon Flowers, S, Senior Hendon Hooker, QB, Graduate Senior Cedric Tillman, WR, Graduate Senior Texas A&M Demani Richardson, DB, Senior Layden Robinson, OL, Junior Ainias Smith, WR/AP, Senior Vanderbilt Ben Bresnahan, TE, Graduate Senior Anfernee Orji, LB, Senior

i believe media days start monday. hell i will just post all of it.getting senile folks.

if anyone wants the complete list that is too bad.....grins. i kid. if anyone wants the complete list i will post it.

maybe they know something we do not?

SEC Shorts puts on auditions to join the league amid conference expansion Keith Farner | 23 hours ago SEC Shorts took some time this offseason to offer its take on conference expansion, and what it would look like if programs held auditions to potentially join the SEC. The popular parody comedians offered this description: It’s been a crazy few weeks in conference expansion and contraction and the SEC is not one to get left behind. They hold open auditions for teams to show up and see if they have what it takes to become SEC material. Among those auditioning were Florida State, Cincinnati, Duke, North Carolina, Clemson and even Sewanee, the University of the South. “Hey, hey, what do you say boys, we run it back one more time for old time sake,” the Sewanee character said. “By the way, y’all haven’t bought into that whole forward pass nonsense have you. It’s a slippery slope I tell you. First thing, you’re chucking it through the air like an old Ford Tri-Motor, and next thing you know, you’re paying the players 2 bits per game.” Missouri even made a pitch just to be reminded that it’s in the SEC, after all. Meanwhile, Vanderbilt and South Carolina were among the programs who didn’t want certain rivals in the mix to join the league. this is great.............grins th

New list names potential Auburn breakout candiates Share this article Jeff Blake-USA TODAY Sports River Wells July 11, 2022 3:36 pm CT You never know which players could break out over a season, but there are certainly some that show more potential than others. A new list by the Montgomery Advertiser has done its best to try and predict who these players will be, and it’s never an easy feat. Here is the criteria the new list uses to try and determine which Auburn players could shine under Bryan Harsin’s second year with the Tigers: “There are two schools of thought for applicable returners. The first type: someone who hasn’t gotten much playing time in previous years and who Auburn needs to step up with increased reps. The second type: someone who’s already a regular but underachieved last season.” There will certainly be an influx of these types of players coming to play for Auburn in Bryan Harsin’s second year. Following the departure of Bo Nix and a massive wave of transfers out of the program following Bryan Harsin’s controversy, plenty of players will have the chance to make their mark on the program as Harsin will desperately look to prove his worth and keep his job at the end of the 2022 season. Here are the six players the list names as potential breakout stars for this— upcoming college football season: Tar'Varish Dawson, Wide Receiver (AP Photo/Butch Dill) Zion Puckett, Safety Stephen Lew-USA TODAY Sports Brandon Council, Offensive Lineman Todd Van Emst/AU Athletics Cam Riley Jr., Linebacker Marvin Gentry-USA TODAY Sports Landon King, Tight End (AP Photo/Vasha Hunt) T.J. Finley, Quarterback Montgomery Advertiser—USA Today

Auburn hiring longtime Dallas Cowboys scout for key off-field role By Tom Green | tgreen@al.com 3 minutes Nov 27, 2021; Auburn, AL, USA; Fans during the game between Auburn and Alabama at Jordan-Hare Stadium. Mandatory Credit: Matthew Shannon/AU AthleticsMatthew Shannon/AU Athletics Bryan Harsin has tabbed a longtime NFL scout to take over a key off-field role within Auburn’s football program this season. A source confirmed to AL.com on Monday afternoon that Auburn is expected to hire Drew Fabianich to serve in a new role as the program’s general manager and director of football scouting and development. The addition of Fabianich, who has nearly two decades of experience in the NFL, is not yet official, but a source told AL.com that a deal is expected to be finalized this week. NFL Network’s Ian Rapoport first reported the move, adding that Fabianich turned down “several NFL opportunities” to take the role at Auburn. Fabianich joined the Cowboys in 2004 as a scout, helping the franchise evaluate in preparation for the NFL Draft each year. At Auburn, Fabianich is expected to help scout talent as part of Auburn’s recruiting efforts -- at the high school and junior college level, as well as through the transfer portal. Given his 18-plus years of experience in the NFL, Fabianich’s role is expected to include duties as a liaison to the league as Auburn works to prepare players for the next level. Prior to his time with the Cowboys, Fabianich spent 18 years in coaching at the college and high school level. He began his coaching career in 1985 coaching quarterbacks and wide receivers at Mesa State College before a two-year stint as a defensive graduate assistant at Baylor. In 1990, he joined Johnny Majors’ staff at Tennessee as defensive line coach, holding that position for three seasons before being named the defensive coordinator at UT-Martin. Fabianich then served as defensive coordinator at ULM from 1997-2000 before spending two years as a high school defensive coordinator at W.T. White High in Dallas. That was followed by is foray into scouting with the Dallas Cowboys. After one year, he was promoted to a regional scout for the Midwest, and in 2008 he was promoted to the role of national scout for the organization -- a position he held until this summer. Tom Green is an Auburn beat reporter for Alabama Media Group. Follow him on Twitter @Tomas_Verde.

most new age right wing republicans were piles of feces that their supporters gathered up and overcooked in an easy bake oven.

you gonna help him get our air back from china? by the way i would rather have biden than a crooked man anyday.

Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch lied under oath about their views on Roe v. Wade Oma Seddiq Mon, July 11, 2022 at 2:31 PM·3 min read In this article: Neil Gorsuch US Supreme Court justice since 2017 Brett Kavanaugh Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States Chuck Schumer American politician Ted Lieu American politician Joe Manchin United States Senator from West Virginia Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez; Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh.Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images; Cheriss May/NurPhoto via Getty Images Ocasio-Cortez called on Senate Democrats to say whether Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch lied. The congresswoman and Rep. Ted Lieu wrote a letter to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer. Ocasio-Cortez has been highly critical of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn abortion rights. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez urged Senate Democratic leadership to take a position on whether Justices Brett Kavanaugh and Neil Gorsuch lied to senators about their views on Roe v. Wade during their Supreme Court confirmation processes. The New York Democrat, along with fellow Democratic Rep. Ted Lieu of California, sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer on Friday demanding he address the matter. "We request that the Senate make its position clear on whether Justices Kavanaugh and Gorsuch lied under oath during their confirmation hearings," the lawmakers wrote in the letter. "We must call out their actions for what they were before the moment passes, so that we can prevent such a mendacious denigration of our fundamental rights and the rule of law from ever happening again." The call comes after Kavanaugh and Gorsuch, both conservative justices appointed by former President Donald Trump, have come under scrutiny following their votes last month to overturn Roe v. Wade, the landmark ruling that established the constitutional right to abortion almost 50 years ago. In their confirmation hearings, the justices called Roe a "precedent" that had been "reaffirmed," but neither directly said they wouldn't overturn the landmark 1973 ruling if presented with the opportunity to do so. Gorsuch said Roe v. Wade was "precedent of the U.S. Supreme Court worthy as treatment of precedent like any other" and that it had been "reaffirmed many times." Kavanaugh similarly called Roe "important precedent of the Supreme Court that has been reaffirmed many times." Republican Sen. Susan Collins of Maine and Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia, who voted to confirm Gorsuch in 2017 and Kavanaugh in 2018, expressed alarm at the consequential outcome, saying they felt misled by the two justices. "This decision is inconsistent with what Justices Gorsuch and Kavanaugh said in their testimony and their meetings with me, where they both were insistent on the importance of supporting long-standing precedents that the country has relied upon," Collins, an abortion-rights supporter, said in a statement. "I trusted Justice Gorsuch and Justice Kavanaugh when they testified under oath that they also believed Roe v. Wade was settled legal precedent and I am alarmed they chose to reject the stability the ruling has provided for two generations of Americans," Manchin, who's personally against abortion but supports legislation to protect abortion rights, said in a statement. Ocasio-Cortez, in the wake of the Supreme Court's decision, seized on the justices' past statements and claimed that they lied about their views on Roe. The progressive Democrat has been highly outspoken and critical of the Supreme Court since its conservative majority tossed out federal abortion rights, arguing the institution faces a "legitimacy crisis." Ocasio-Cortez said she believed lying under oath during confirmation hearings is an impeachable offense and it's "something that should be very seriously considered" by lawmakers, including Collins and Manchin. "To allow that to stand is to allow it to happen," she told NBC News on June 26. "What makes it particularly dangerous is that it sends a blaring signal to all future nominees that they can now lie to duly elected members of the United States Senate in order to secure Supreme Court confirmations and seats on the Supreme Court." Read the original article on Business Insider

i believe closely like you do but did we not get in this jam before and someone in the middle east bail us out? i hope it can help but i honestly doubt it will.

is herschel a victim of the gop's "shock and awe" type crap? i was reading where all the nuts the repubs have scrounged up is by design to create chaos and confusion. i hate it for herschel because he should be considered one of the greatest backs in college football but he will have a ton of hashtags,etc, on him now and people will marvel at how stupid he is years from now.

i do not believe you.the bible is supposed to be a book of love but it is used as a weapon as quoting certain scripture to justify having slaves. and your problem is you think too much and do not listen therefore you will never learn much if anything at all. have you ever mentioned you were wrong about anything on here? this is why you get made fun of on here.

i know all about pagans as i have several friends that are. christmas was yule. i disagree. you have people like hershel walker saying china stole our good air and and replaced it with their bad. circle your own heard before you nitpick with me over santa claus. and like it or not malcolm X considered it racist just like the long haired blue eyed jesus. are you out of touch that much? hell we have black members on this board ask them what they think about it. by the way i AM black irish. i forgot the spring equinox which was and is basically the rebirth of life to pagans. most pagan holidays were changed by christians because they considered pagans bad. and again jesus had to be reborn by whites because who wants to worship a black jesus? not the vast majority of white folks i can assure you. racism is embedded so deeply in white culture things about christianity have been changed. his image was probably the first.

Tweet See new Tweets Conversation @JonRothstein Well embedded moles in the Southeast have sent word that Dylan Cardwell is arguably the most improved player in Auburn's program. 6-11 big man has an opportunity to carve out space in Tigers' rotation at C following Walker Kessler's departure to the NBA.

do you think the left would let a cop off over hurting and shooting someone so they can move to another town in other states and continue the same damn crap? go look into the "we own this city" stuff. baltimore maryland had crooked cops running the streets all day long. i will not apologize for the series they made on one of the cable providers because it is based on fact but foe those that have time go look it up. it is an eye opener and the dust still has not settled yet. look there are folks that just love to hate anything that is non white. it is so ingrained in us we miss little things. no black santa or jesus. blacks are stupid. blacks have inferior genes. race has hardly gotten better in the country folks just went more underground with it. there is a growing fear on both sides, black and white, to distrust each other. here is a rule to mostly tell if a black man or a white man was shot. ask yourself how many times each was shot and were they running in fear of their life?then ask yourself how many times? white supremacists found a lot of love in the trump white house and it has emboldened them.many are in fact police officers. anniston had some but we got rid of them. then they turned around and hired one back as a deputy and i never found out why. what i am wondering is why you need proof when you should be able to see it easily?

i am not sure an opinion counts much when children are being murdered. and is this not the second time the police were slow in getting our kids to safety? i cannot remember the other one there there so many these days. i will say we do have some great officers out there that wold do the right thing if allowed.

maybe i never did but i just do not understand my country anymore.

they never mention how bad the kids are screwed up as well. it happened to my last ex. molested from 4 to 16. he threatened to kill her whole family and ruined her life. i was going to protect my ex tho i have no use for her but i remembered i have already told this. she is so screwed up in so many ways. she horrible nightmares so we had to have the cartoon network on at night to help her sleep. she would scream and it could be me but when she cried she sounded like a little bitty girl. to further throw trauma of having her molesters baby and having to deal with him is wrong on so many levels it pisses me off.

10-year-old rape victim denied abortion after Roe v Wade overturn Jade Biggs Tue, July 5, 2022 at 5:36 AM·2 min read In this article: Kristi Noem American politician Photo credit: Elijah Nouvelage - Getty Images A 10-year-old rape victim, who was six weeks pregnant, was denied an abortion following the US Supreme Court's decision to overturn Roe v Wade. The ruling means there is no longer a nationwide right to terminate a pregnancy and individual states now have the freedom to make their own laws on abortion access. The girl, who lives in Ohio, was ineligible to have an abortion in her own state in light of Roe v Wade being overturned and was forced to travel to Indiana for the procedure. Currently, abortion in Indiana is legal, but lawmakers are expected to bring in tighter restrictions later this month when the state assembly comes together. "It’s hard to imagine that in just a few short weeks we will have no ability to provide that care," Dr Caitlin Bernard, an Indianapolis obstetrician-gynecologist, told the Columbus Dispatch. Bernard had treated the girl after a colleague in Ohio who works with child abuse victims called and asked for help. Abortion providers like Bernard say they have seen a sharp increase in the number of patients, from the nearby states where such procedures are now restricted or banned, coming to their clinics for abortion. The case has further reignited conversation in the US about abortion rights, and has forced anti-abortion political figures to address how the rights of women and girls – including abuse victims – will be balanced against abortion restrictions. Photo credit: SOPA Images - Getty Images Yet some anti-abortionists have seemingly deflected on the matter, with Republican governor Kristi Noem of South Dakota – where abortion is now illegal unless "necessary to preserve the life of the pregnant female" – telling CNN that the public should be "addressing those sick individuals [who] do this to our children" adding that "nobody’s talking about the pervert, horrible and deranged individual that raped a 10-year-old." As for whether she would push to change the law in South Dakota if a similar case occurred, Noem said: "I don’t believe a tragic situation should be perpetuated by another tragedy. There’s more that we have got to do to make sure that we really are living a life that says every life is precious, especially innocent lives that have been shattered, like that 10-year-old girl." When asked if the 10-year-old should have had the baby, the Republican replied, "every single life – every single life is precious. This tragedy is horrific. But, in South Dakota, the law today is that the abortions are illegal, except to save the life of the mother." Although, Noem did not rule out that performing an abortion on the 10-year-old could be classed as protecting the life of the pregnant female. "Yes, that situation, the doctor, the family, the individuals closest to that will make the decisions there for that family."

on the sec network. all day and night i believe. they will show the spring game as well. happy fourth!

Impeach Clarence Thomas? Nearly a million people have signed a petition asking for it By Brian Linder | blinder@pennlive.com 2-3 minutes Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas sits as he is introduced during an event at the Library of Congress in Washington. (Pablo Martinez Monsivais/AP)AP Impeach Clarence Thomas? Well, if things keep trending the way they are, more than a million people will have signed a petition by the time the Fourth of July rolls around requesting just that. The petition, posted to MoveOn.org, was past 907,000 signatures Saturday. “The right-wing Supreme Court overturned Roe vs. Wade last week, effectively taking away the right to privacy and bodily autonomy that’s been considered legal precedent for the past 50 years,” the petition reads. “Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas—who sided with the majority on overturning Roe—made it clear what’s next: to overturn high court rulings that establish gay rights and contraception rights.” The petition also cites what it says is a potential conflict of interest between a recent ruling of Thomas’ as it pertains to Jan. 6, and his wife, Ginni, who has been accused of supporting efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election. “Recently, Justice Clarence Thomas voted against a Supreme Court decision to compel the release of Donald Trump’s records regarding the January 6 insurrection and attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election,” the petition reads. “It has become clear that his wife—longtime conservative activist Ginni Thomas—was actively urging the White House to overturn election results both leading up to January 6 and after the deadly insurrection.” The petition says that Thomas’ “failure to recuse himself warrants immediate investigation and heightened alarm.” “He has shown he cannot be an impartial justice and is more concerned with covering up his wife’s coup attempts than the health of the Supreme Court,” it alleges. “He must resign—or Congress must immediately investigate and impeach.” The entire petition with its statement and comments can be viewed here. Note to readers: if you purchase something through one of our affiliate links we may earn a commission.

What does Christianity say about Roe vs. Wade? Rev. David Wilson Rogers Sat, July 2, 2022 at 11:36 AM The dramatic reversal of the landmark Roe v. Wade and ruling allowing voluntary prayer at state functions such as football games by the Supreme Court have catastrophic implications that will affect Christianity in profoundly negative ways. The reason has little to do with actual abortions or the legitimacy of Christian prayer. Rather, Christianity has been resoundingly injured by the way in which the abortion and prayer debate has evolved over time and the way many Christians have presumptively celebrated these decisions. Abortion has been cultivated within American Christianity as a polarizing, emotionally charged, all-or-nothing issue. For legitimate and understandable reasons, many believe that abortion is a heinous sin, tantamount to child sacrifice. Likewise, for legitimate and understandable reasons many see abortion as an essential aspect of women’s reproductive health and necessary as a health care option. Right or wrong, the option for abortion has been part of American law for nearly 50 years. Fundamentally, it is—and always has been—a political issue. The problem is that in the passionate absolutism of the hateful division regarding the matter, both sides of the argument have arrogantly chosen to fundamentally demonize the other side without any degree of Christian compassion, understanding, forgiveness or love. Rather than working as Christ’s ambassadors in the world, far too many people have become judgmental warriors determined to destroy a side they refuse to understand or revel in arrogant victory over the presumed enemy they want to see destroyed. When it comes to prayer, the presumed victory allowing a coach the opportunity to lead public prayer on the football field, may seem like a victory for Christ to those who are short-sighted enough to believe that it gives license to promote Christian values in the schools, but in a nation that is founded on religious freedom, it also gives license for all religious traditions to freely, and perhaps simultaneously, evoke public displays of prayer on the local High School Football 50 yard line. How many Christians celebrating this Supreme Court ruling would be happy to see Christians, Muslims, Wiccans, Pagans, Satanists, Druids, and whomever else believed in a particular religious tradition other than Christianity all simultaneously gathering on their own little section of the center field to offer praise to their particular understanding of God? Another dangerous aspect of the Supreme Court actions is that such rulings, when forced to be decided by the courts rather than a legislative system that has completely broken down in partisan failure, it ceases to be an act of healthy democracy. Just as Roe v. Wade was forced on the nation a half-century ago because elected leaders failed to reach a just and equitable means to protect human rights and resorted to an activist Court, this latest ruling has been forced on the nation by activist Justices in ways that will not resolve the debate or heal the division. It is likely a fact that, right or wrong, this ruling has only served to deepen the hate-filled ideological division within our nation. Considering that right now the United States is perhaps more ideologically divided than at any other time besides the carnage and sin of the Civil War, further polarization and division is likely not going to help make this nation great at all. When political values are dressed in religious fever, superimposed on Scripture, rallied in church worship, entrenched in exclusivist spiritual doctrine, and then rammed through the legal system in order to be canonized into law, Christ loses. Differences of understanding, biblical interpretation, and ideological understanding are part of being a diverse nation of free people. It is what makes America great. Unfortunately, these rulings do not serve God. They serve evil. This article originally appeared on Carlsbad Current-Argus: What does Christianity say about Roe vs. Wade?

Donald Trump may soon announce he’ll run for the presidency because he’s having a fit about the dirt revealed about him in Jan. 6 hearings, and because he has “all the impulse control of a freaking toddler,” a former GOP official scoffed Saturday. “At the end of the day, he’s going to do whatever he wants. He’s shown that time and time again,” Kurt Bardella, a former deputy communications director for the GOP-controlled House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, told MSNBC. (He’s now a Democrat and news commentator.) “This guy has the impulse control of a freaking toddler. So nobody should be surprised about that at all. I think that Republicans, yeah, this is the golem they created,” Bardella added. Bardella was responding to a New York Times story Friday that Trump is hoping a stepped-up announcement about going for the presidency — yet again — will distract the public from a “stream of damaging revelations,” and could declare he’s entering the race as early as this month. “We all know from past experiences Donald Trump doesn’t care about anybody else but Donald Trump,” Bardella told MSNBC host Alex Witt. “So it doesn’t surprise me that when faced with the criticism that’s been mounting right now, following the January 6th hearings, that he’s thinking about pulling the trigger now.” That timing will likely “ruin” things for the Republicans ahead of the midterms as more negative testimony taints the candidate, said Bardella. But it’s what Republicans deserve for tying their future to Trump, he said. “You know what, Donald?” Bardella said. “Go out there, show everybody who you are, what you want to do, implode the Republican Party before November.” “These guys have wanted to divorce themselves from Donald Trump for the last five years; they just have lacked courage, the ability, the guts to actually do it,” Bardella added. Behind the scenes “they are rooting for the Jan. 6 committee.” Bardella claimed that “nobody was was more excited” about the powerful testimony early this week by Cassidy Hutchinson than “Republicans who want to dispense with Donald Trump.” Among her most damning revelations, Hutchinson, who was an aide to former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, testified that Trump wanted to drop screening for his supporters, who were known to be carrying weapons, and allow them to march to the Capitol Jan. 6, 2021. “They’re not here to hurt me,” Hutchinson quoted Trump as saying. Check out Bardella’s full interview about Trump in the video below. He talks about Trump stepping up his race announcement beginning at 5:30: This article originally appeared on HuffPost and has been updated.